Wording An Invitation Pay For There Own Food

Individual Freedom and Fears

would be very easy to say that guy is OK, individualism is passed. But not about that thing. Individualism is not only a "extremism" of the individual, rather it is a trend that leads to the disconnection of the other guys. As such, moreover, a tendency is clearly enhanced and supported by the system, they have long feared a lot more groups than individuals.

The construction of the individual, personal freedom, liberation from social bonds and group, or put another way, the waiver of gregariousness as a role model, is a progressive conquest of the last two centuries in the West. A milestone in this process was the Universal Declaration of Human Rights of 1948, human rights can not be understood but as rights of individuals. Something very different are these much more abstract rights are the rights of peoples. Do not deny it, but it should not be understood as rights that affect them, individually, to a sum of people. When not, based on those rights come to commit many atrocities. With these disquisitions

previous, which I was away too much of my purpose, I want to talk about here is a movie I've seen few days ago, its title: Arcadia , and its director: Costa Gavras . Was produced in 2005 but I have recently viewing at home thanks to its distribution earlier this year by the newspaper.

Like most films this renowned Greek director who lived long time in France, it is a political film . It may not look like someone off guard, and may even have to think that this is simply a thriller with a serial murderer in the middle. But there is a political film, and the good. What happens is that politics in this day and age is not talking about strikes or mass major conflicts, is to venture a thesis on what we can do as individuals to not be definitely submitted by the system.

History Gavras tells us is that of a top company executive who, having lost his job and the possibility of collapsed definitely see their status and high level of life (big house in the suburbs, two cars, a luxury, etc, etc) decides to take a solitary struggle and beyond moral against what stands between your reality and desire. And what brought you, by an individualistic and wrong of the problem, there is nothing more than all its competitors, the candidates for the same job to which he aspires. Thus, after investigating who are the executives who have made the same offer curriculum work, decides to go off one by one until he be the only possible contract.

After many vicissitudes and a quite astonishing even to himself, does kill them all and go unpunished and beyond sopecha. Contributes to that the fact that one of those same candidates, in an even more depressing than yours, committed suicide before he gets to kill him, leaving a letter that was interpreted by its ambiguity, as a self-incrimination of the other deaths.

The truth is that the hero, and murderer, reaches its goal and was hired for the job. But the final scene shows through the weakness of false balance achieved, another competitor, in this case a young competitor, having reached the same situation that had come before him, stands on the company and ask to speak with him. The game looks no leaves doubt as to what their purposes: it is proposed to start the fight he rushed individualist, fighting to start by removing him as a competitor.

In our pursuit of happiness who are our enemies. " This foul system, probably very close to its self-destruction, has got embedded in us the competitive mechanism as a supreme value, supposedly the best way to reach our goals. The reality is quite different article because most of the things that can make us happy are only achievable in a group, family, couple.

Moral: the individual struggle, especially in the workplace, not a solution.